Matka zamordowanego ma takie podejrzenia:
Mimo niepodważalnych dowodów na miejscu zbrodni, Altman utrzymuje wersję o samobójstwie:
Gówniana przeszłość Sama Altmana:
Sam Altman w maglu Tuckera Carlsona:
Więcej o psychopatach tworzących AI:
ps.
Sam Altman ma coś wspólnego z mordercami z IDF (jest agentem mossadu?):
Altman and Mulherin committed to giving away most of their wealth by signing The Giving Pledge in May 2024.[129] The couple has a son, born in 2025.[130] Altman enjoys prepping, saying in 2016, „I have guns, gold, potassium iodide, antibiotics, batteries, water, gas masks from the Israeli Defense Force, and a big patch of land in Big Sur I can fly to.”[123]
i tak jak wiele osób z branży ma deficytowe (schizoidalne?) podłoże instynktowe, gdyż jest homoseksualny (wykształcenie prawidłowej wyższej uczuciowości ludzkiej – krystalizacja – jest niemożliwe bez ukierunkowania popędu seksualnego na właściwą osobę płci przeciwnej – dążność do przedłużenia gatunku/linii składa się na prawidłowy instynkt):
ps2.
Morderstwo swojego pracownika, nie jest jedynym morderstwem w które zamieszany jest Altman?:
Aaron Swartz, the famed coder and hacktivist who died by suicide in 2013, used similar language to describe Altman. Swartz had been batchmates with Altman in the inaugural class of 2005 at the Silicon Valley incubator Y Combinator, and warned his friends about Altman shortly before his passing.
“You need to understand that Sam can never be trusted,” he told one confidante. “He is a sociopath. He would do anything.”
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/sources-sam-altman-sociopath
Termin socjopata którego mianem był określany przez osoby z jego kręgu to termin mało precyzyjny, wzięty z socjologii, która jest ślepa na psychopatów i ich odmienne od ludzkich natury.
Szkoda, że na wyższych uczelniach technicznych w Polsce i gdzie indziej obowiązkowym przedmiotem humanistycznym jest socjologia, a nie psychopatologia.
ps3.
What really happened with Aaron Swartz?
Squires provided no reason for the move, but in a readme file accompanying last week’s malicious update, he included the words “What really happened with Aaron Swartz?”
Swartz tragically took his own life after facing federal hacking charges that could have landed him in prison for 50 years. The charges—for alleged computer hacking crimes and wire fraud—stemmed from Swartz logging into a network at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and scraping millions of academic papers that were behind a paywall. After being locked out of the MIT Wi-Fi system, he entered an MIT network closet and plugged a laptop directly into the campus network.
At the same time that he included the cryptic Swartz reference in the readme file, Squires also tweeted those same words and included a link to this thread claiming that Swartz was murdered after he discovered child-abuse porn on MIT servers. This now-deleted post, included in the thread, stated:
No, it is not Aaron Swartz who should be on trial but that lofty institution of hired learning, MIT, which is responsible for the heinous crimes that led to his death. The risks taken on by Swartz, which have threatened MIT, can be understood only through the issue of child porn as orchestrated and produced by its acclaimed professors and distributed to their wealthy and powerful sponsors. The MIT cyber-pimps cater to a clientele that includes the highest echelon of the State Department, major corporations, intelligence agencies, the military brass, and the White House.
Every element in the Swartz case indicates that he died in a heroic attempt to expose the perversion that has corrupted the hearts and minds of the global elite, a heinous and often murderous vice that traumatizes innocent children and threatens every family on this planet.
